Summary
In 25 E. 83 Corp. v. 83rd St. Assocs., 213 AD2d 269 (1st Dept. 1995), the plaintiff was held not to be the prevailing party where "all of its substantive claims," including its cause of action for unpaid maintenance, were dismissed (Id. at 269).
Summary of this case from Reade v. 405 Lexington, LLCOpinion
March 21, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.).
It is settled that only a prevailing party is ordinarily entitled to attorney's fees and that to be considered a prevailing party, there must be success with respect to the central relief sought (Nestor v. McDowell, 81 N.Y.2d 410, 415-416). Applying that standard, the Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff was not the prevailing party since all of its substantive claims, including the first cause of action for unpaid maintenance, were dismissed. In fact, by successfully defending against plaintiff's lawsuit, defendant must be regarded as the prevailing party. We therefore remand for a hearing to determine the appropriate award of defendant's counsel fees, without costs.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.