Opinion
13809 Index No. 153031/20 Case No. 2020-02413
05-11-2021
In the Matter of 240W35, LLC, Petitioner–Respondent, v. 243 WEST 34TH STREET LLC, Respondent–Appellant.
Judith M. Brener, New York (Bension D. DeFunis of counsel), for appellant. Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C., New York (Jeffrey R. Metz of counsel), for respondent.
Judith M. Brener, New York (Bension D. DeFunis of counsel), for appellant.
Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C., New York (Jeffrey R. Metz of counsel), for respondent.
Gische, J.P., Kapnick, Oing, Singh, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laurence L. Love, J.), entered May 5, 2020, which granted petitioner a limited license pursuant to RPAPL 881 to access respondent's property to perform repairs to petitioner's property, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The terms of the license granted by the motion court were reasonable (see Matter of Tsoumpas 1105 Lexington Equities, LLC v. 1109 Lexington Ave. LLC, 189 A.D.3d 524, 525, 133 N.Y.S.3d 800 [1st Dept. 2020] ). Respondent fails to identify any prejudice arising from the license, for which it will be duly compensated upon application. Nothing in the court's determination would preclude respondent from seeking additional relief as future circumstances require ( id. ).
We have considered respondent's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.