From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

24 Hour Fitness, USA, Inc. v. Sherwin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-3220-JLK (D. Colo. Jun. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-3220-JLK

06-07-2012

24 HOUR FITNESS, USA, INC., a California corporation d/b/a 24 HOUR FITNESS, Plaintiff, v. MARK SHERWIN, Defendant.


Judge John L. Kane


ORDER

Kane J.

After being served with Plaintiff's Petition to Compel Arbitration (doc. 1), Defendant filed a letter with the court expressing his intent to withdraw from arbitration with Defendant for an unspecified amount awarded in a lawsuit with Plaintiff. Although his letter is not entirely clear, as Plaintiff notes Defendant has not been awarded any amount in connection with any lawsuit against Plaintiff, it seems to indicate that Defendant does not intend to pursue an arbitration claim against Plaintiff.

In reply, Plaintiff stated that it "has no objection to the closure of this case and the dismissal without prejudice of its Petition to Compel Arbitration." Reply to Respondent's "Letter of Intent to Withdraw" (doc. 10). I liberally construe Plaintiff's reply as a motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Finding good cause appearing, Plaintiff's Petition to Compel Arbitration (doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

Senior U.S. District Court Judge


Summaries of

24 Hour Fitness, USA, Inc. v. Sherwin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-3220-JLK (D. Colo. Jun. 7, 2012)
Case details for

24 Hour Fitness, USA, Inc. v. Sherwin

Case Details

Full title:24 HOUR FITNESS, USA, INC., a California corporation d/b/a 24 HOUR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jun 7, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-3220-JLK (D. Colo. Jun. 7, 2012)