From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

230 Seaman Assocs. v. Mullahey

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Oct 18, 2019
65 Misc. 3d 136 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

570071/19

10-18-2019

230 SEAMAN ASSOCIATES LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant, v. Diane MULLAHEY, Respondent-Tenant-Respondent.


Per Curiam.

Order (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered May 18, 2018, reversed, without costs, motion denied, and money judgment reinstated.

Civil Court erred in vacating the consent money judgment entered pursuant to the parties' November 2007 so-ordered stipulation of settlement. Respondent failed to establish that the judgment had been satisfied (see CPLR 5021 ; Matter of Quiggle v. Quiggle , 144 AD2d 1011 [1988] ). Although respondent asserted that the principal amount of the judgment was ultimately paid, she failed to recognize that interest has accrued since the judgment was entered in 2007 (see CPLR 5003, 5004 ; Feldman v. Brodsky , 12 AD2d 347 [1961], affd 11 NY2d 692 [1962] ). Nor did respondent establish any other basis for vacating the judgment (see CPLR 5015[a] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

230 Seaman Assocs. v. Mullahey

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Oct 18, 2019
65 Misc. 3d 136 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

230 Seaman Assocs. v. Mullahey

Case Details

Full title:230 Seaman Associates LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant, v. Diane…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Oct 18, 2019

Citations

65 Misc. 3d 136 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 51648
119 N.Y.S.3d 6