From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

2030 Astoria Developers, LLC v. Haikalis

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Feb 23, 2015
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 65226 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)

Opinion

Motion No: 2014-00661 QC

02-23-2015

2030 Astoria Developers, LLC, Respondent, v. Andreas Haikalis, Appellant.


MICHELLE WESTON

THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by respondent to strike the appellant's brief on an appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, entered January 29, 2014. Cross motion by appellant for an enlargement of time to serve and file papers in opposition to respondent's motion.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and cross motion, it is

ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the appeal is stricken from the general calendar and the appeals calendar; and it is further,

ORDERED that respondent's motion and appellant's cross motion are denied as academic.

In an affirmation in support of the cross motion, appellant's counsel states that statements were made at oral argument which are essential to the determination of the appeal. In these circumstances, the appeal has not been properly perfected, as a transcript of oral argument has not been made part of the record on appeal.

ENTER:

Paul Kenny

Chief Clerk


Summaries of

2030 Astoria Developers, LLC v. Haikalis

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Feb 23, 2015
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 65226 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)
Case details for

2030 Astoria Developers, LLC v. Haikalis

Case Details

Full title:2030 Astoria Developers, LLC, Respondent, v. Andreas Haikalis, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts

Date published: Feb 23, 2015

Citations

2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 65226 (N.Y. App. Term 2015)