From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

1st Rate Mortg. Corp. v. Vision Mortg. Servs. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Nov 22, 2011
Case No. 09-C-471 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 09-C-471

11-22-2011

1ST RATE MORTGAGE CORP., Plaintiff, v. VISION MORTGAGE SERVICES CORP., et al. Defendants.


ORDER

Defendant Ronald Hugo has filed a letter asking that I reconsider my partial denial of his summary judgment motion. The motion will be denied. Hugo cites a few lines from the deposition testimony of Plaintiff William Thayse that Hugo claims show that Thayse authorized his conduct. Read generously, the deposition testimony could suggest consent, but consent was not the topic of the deposition questions and the few sparse responses certainly do not show conclusively that Thayse had given consent to copy the files in question. Hugo is free to argue the point to the jury (if it is relevant), but it is not a basis for reconsideration.

In addition, the issue of consent was not a part of the motion for summary judgment. Thus, there is no basis to "reconsider" that decision. The motion is DENIED.

William C. Griesbach

United States District Judge


Summaries of

1st Rate Mortg. Corp. v. Vision Mortg. Servs. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Nov 22, 2011
Case No. 09-C-471 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

1st Rate Mortg. Corp. v. Vision Mortg. Servs. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:1ST RATE MORTGAGE CORP., Plaintiff, v. VISION MORTGAGE SERVICES CORP., et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

Case No. 09-C-471 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 22, 2011)