1985 Robert Street Assoc. v. Menard, Inc.

2 Citing cases

  1. Swanson v. Wenzel

    No. C1-97-2185, C5-97-1881 (Minn. Ct. App. May. 26, 1998)

    The district court's findings and conclusions were not clearly erroneous, and its strict construction of the sale provision in the dissolution decree was proper. See 1985 Robert St. Assoc. v. Menard, Inc., 403 N.W.2d 900, 901-902 (Minn.App. 1987). Appellant's motion for additional visitation when the children are not in daycare presents no evidence that was not available to the district court when it entered the decree.

  2. Phillips Neighborhood Hsg. Tr. v. Brown

    564 N.W.2d 573 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 4 times

    We are aware that eviction is a harsh remedy that will not be enforced when the party seeking eviction has another adequate remedy. See 1985 Robert St. Assoc. v. Menard, Inc., 403 N.W.2d 900, 902 (Minn.App. 1987). However, PNHT has an obligation to provide a safe environment for its tenants, and there is a strong public policy interest in eliminating drugs from subsidized housing.