In Joralemon, there was a provision in a contract for the sale of real property that provided that the contract would not be binding until both sides executed the contract (id.).
Summary of this case from Oster v. CastelMarch 28, 2011.
Frauds, Statute of — Sufficiency of Memorandum. Lis Pendens — Cancellation.
In Joralemon, there was a provision in a contract for the sale of real property that provided that the contract would not be binding until both sides executed the contract (id.).
Summary of this case from Oster v. CastelFull title:184 Joralemon LLC v. Brooklyn Law School
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County
Date published: Mar 28, 2011
Here, plaintiff alleges that the hard copy of the signed contract sent on Friday, May 27 was the final…
Nall v. Estate of PowellHere, because the court has dismissed the complaint, the notice of pendency must be canceled. See Yenom Corp.…