From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

1770 East 14th Street Associates v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 7, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the complaint is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County; and it is further,

Ordered that the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, shall deliver to the Clerk of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, all papers filed in the action and certified copies of all minutes and entries.

The Supreme Court did not err in finding that this matter would be best resolved by the Civil Court of the City of New York (see generally, RPAPL 701 et seq.; Civil Ct Act § 204). However, rather than dismissing the action, the Supreme Court should have transferred the matter to the Civil Court (see, N.Y. Const, art VI, § 19 [a]). Mangano, P.J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

1770 East 14th Street Associates v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

1770 East 14th Street Associates v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:1770 EAST 14TH STREET ASSOCIATES, Appellant, v. JEROME HARRIS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 596

Citing Cases

Scholes Residence LLC v. Clark

New York courts consistently recognize a strong public policy against forum shopping (see, e.g., Liebert, 34…

81 BOWERY REALTY CORP. v. QUI HUI CHEN

Although certain appellate courts have held that Supreme Court should have transferred specific ejectment…