Opinion
December 16, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garson, J.).
Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the cross motion is denied, and it is declared that the defendant has no duty to defend and indemnify the plaintiff in the action entitled Bell v. 77 Realty Corp.
The plaintiff had the burden of demonstrating a reasonable excuse for delaying more than six months in notifying the defendant of the accident which gave rise to the underlying personal injury action ( see, Argentina v. Otsego Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 86 N.Y.2d 748; Security Mut. Ins. Co. v. Acker-Fitzsimmons Corp., 31 N.Y.2d 436). Under the circumstances of this case, the plaintiff's belief that liability would not result was unreasonable as a matter of law ( see, Vradenburg v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., 212 A.D.2d 913; Herold v. East Coast Scaffolding, 208 A.D.2d 592; cf., D'Aloia v. Travelers Ins. Co., 85 N.Y.2d 825).
Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Thompson, JJ., concur.