From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

1621 St. Nicholas Ave Owners LLC v. Cruz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 3, 2017
146 A.D.3d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

01-03-2017

In re 1621 ST. NICHOLAS AVE OWNERS LLC, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Rhina CRUZ, Respondent–Appellant.

Northern Manhattan Improvement Corp. Legal Services, New York (Kimberly J. Warner of counsel), for appellant. Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler, Nahins & Goidel, P.C., New York (David B. Rosenbaum of counsel), for respondent.


Northern Manhattan Improvement Corp. Legal Services, New York (Kimberly J. Warner of counsel), for appellant.

Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler, Nahins & Goidel, P.C., New York (David B. Rosenbaum of counsel), for respondent.

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered February 8, 2016, which reversed an order of the Civil Court, New York County (Anna Katz, J.), entered April 28, 2014, in a nonpayment summary proceeding, conditionally granting respondent tenant's motion for a stay of execution of a warrant of eviction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Given respondent's extensive and lengthy history of rent defaults before and during the pendency of this proceeding, and the absence of an adequate explanation for her failure to comply with the terms of the stipulation of settlement, no good cause has been shown to justify a further stay of execution of the warrant of eviction (see Chelsea 19 Assoc. v. James, 67 A.D.3d 601, 889 N.Y.S.2d 564 [1st Dept.2009] ).

FRIEDMAN, J.P., SWEENY, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

1621 St. Nicholas Ave Owners LLC v. Cruz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 3, 2017
146 A.D.3d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

1621 St. Nicholas Ave Owners LLC v. Cruz

Case Details

Full title:In re 1621 ST. NICHOLAS AVE OWNERS LLC, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Rhina…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 3, 2017

Citations

146 A.D.3d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 10
43 N.Y.S.3d 741

Citing Cases

52 Hamilton Place NYC Corp. v. Araman

Tenant offered no excuse for her multiple defaults in appearance nor any adequate explanation for her failure…

52 Hamilton Place NYC Corp. v. Araman

Tenant offered no excuse for her multiple defaults in appearance nor any adequate explanation for her failure…