From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

105 East Second Street Associates v. Bobrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 3, 1991
176 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

October 3, 1991


"Pending the new inquest upon compensatory and punitive damages ordered herein, the judgment entered in this action in favor of counterclaim-plaintiffs and against counterclaim-defendants on April 26, 1990 shall remain in full force and effect, counterclaim-plaintiffs may conduct, without limitation, all lawful enforcement proceedings, and the lien of said judgment shall stand as security until such time as it is superseded by any further judgment directed by the inquest court following the assessment hearing."

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Wallach, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

105 East Second Street Associates v. Bobrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 3, 1991
176 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

105 East Second Street Associates v. Bobrow

Case Details

Full title:105 EAST SECOND STREET ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, v. JOY BOBROW, as Register…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 3, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

RODA DRILLING COMPANY v. SIEGAL

The court has determined that Plaintiffs suffered a breach of fiduciary duty occasioned by Defendants'…

LEDY v. WILSON

There must be a causal link between the defendants' alleged conduct, and a plaintiff's loss of…