From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

1040 Springfield Ave. v. C.I.R

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Dec 13, 1950
185 F.2d 406 (3d Cir. 1950)

Opinion

No. 10199.

Argued December 5, 1950.

Decided December 13, 1950.

Appeal from a Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

Murry M. Weinstein, New York City, for petitioner.

Fred E. Youngman, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen. (Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.


In this appeal from the Tax Court the taxpayer seeks to override that court's conclusion that the failure to file a personal holding company return for the period in question was due to wilful neglect. Our decisions in Girard Investment Co. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1941, 122 F.2d 843 and Hatfried, Inc. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1947, 162 F.2d 628 are relied on. But unlike the situations in those cases, there is an express finding that the petitioner did not advise its tax consultant of all the facts pertaining to the question of whether or not it was a personal holding company. This finding has adequate support in the evidence. The cases above cited are not applicable.

The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

1040 Springfield Ave. v. C.I.R

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Dec 13, 1950
185 F.2d 406 (3d Cir. 1950)
Case details for

1040 Springfield Ave. v. C.I.R

Case Details

Full title:1040 SPRINGFIELD AVENUE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Dec 13, 1950

Citations

185 F.2d 406 (3d Cir. 1950)