From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

1009 Second Ave. Assocs. v. Benenson Capital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1998
256 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 22, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.).


Plaintiff's additional bill of particulars is adequately responsive to a demand that improperly sought much in the way of evidentiary material ( see, Rabat v. GNAC Corp., 155 A.D.2d 245). The lack of knowledge of the deposition witnesses produced by defendant partnership warrants the deposition of the individual on whom plaintiff served a subpoena ( see, Tower v. Chemical Bank, 140 A.D.2d 514).

Concur — Tom, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

1009 Second Ave. Assocs. v. Benenson Capital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1998
256 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

1009 Second Ave. Assocs. v. Benenson Capital

Case Details

Full title:1009 SECOND AVENUE ASSOCIATES, Respondent, v. BENENSON CAPITAL COMPANY et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 348