From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

100 Hudson Tenants Corp. v. Laber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 29, 1983
98 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

December 29, 1983

Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lee Price, J.), entered November 22, 1982, insofar as it denied appellant's motion brought, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a]), to dismiss the second cause of action in the first amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action, dismissed as moot, without costs.


Subsequent to the denial of defendant-appellant's motion to dismiss, the plaintiff served a second amended complaint, and a motion has been made by the defendant to dismiss the second amended complaint, and this motion is presently pending before Special Term. An amended pleading, when served, takes the place of the original pleading. ( Branower Son v. Waldes, 173 App. Div. 676.) Thus, the appeal from the order based on the first amended complaint pleading, is rendered academic. ( Mattsson v. Johns-Manville Prods. Corp., 78 A.D.2d 793; Abrams v. Community Servs., 76 A.D.2d 765.)


Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Sandler, Milonas and Alexander, JJ.


Summaries of

100 Hudson Tenants Corp. v. Laber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 29, 1983
98 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

100 Hudson Tenants Corp. v. Laber

Case Details

Full title:100 HUDSON TENANTS CORP., Respondent, v. AUSTIN A. LABER et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1983

Citations

98 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Tarlo v. 270 Fifth St. Corp.

The original complaint was superseded by the amended complaint. The original complaint is no longer viable,…

Wimbledon Fin. Master Fund, Ltd. v. Weston Capital Mgmt. LLC

We take judicial notice of the since-filed second amended complaint, and defendants' motion to dismiss the…