This week’s Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence marks an important advancement toward much-needed regulation of the development and application of AI. The latest generation of generative AI models, most notably OpenAI’s GPT-4 and ChatGPT, their general use chatbot, have already profoundly affected how millions of people live and work, worldwide.
The Executive Order seeks to “advance and govern the development and use of AI in accordance with eight guiding principles and priorities.” Taken from the full text of the Executive Order, they are:
These eight principles do an excellent job of implicitly distinguishing between two different types of AI applications. The first is where AI is introduced to supplant human decision-making, often seen in policing, sentencing, education admission, and housing decisions. Because these uses significantly impact people’s lives and can introduce a high risk of bias, they require timely and targeted controls, and the White House is appropriately aggressive on these. This is the higher risk of the two applications, and the principles identify appropriate controls for this category.
The second set of applications use AI to elevate information humans (and entire professions) can use to drive better, often more efficient decision-making. These are the applications where accuracy and transparency is key, but the risks are quite different and more limited, and thus the emphasis is, appropriately, on incentivizing and promoting innovation.
Few professions have been or will be more affected than law. Given what we’ve heard from so many CoCounsel customers about how much our AI legal assistant has improved their day-to-day work and the services they deliver to their clients, we’re encouraged that the Executive Order balances the real need for controlling fraudulent, misleading, or inegalitarian uses of AI with the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to promote applications that can drive unprecedented value and benefit to Americans across so many facets of our lives. The potential for legal applications built on top of LLMs to advance access to justice in America, where more than 80% of all civil legal disputes are not represented by counsel, cannot be overstated.
A dynamic AI ecosystem, subject to necessary accuracy, safety, and privacy controls, can certainly and has already improved the legal profession, but it also has the potential to do even more to expand access to justice, address climate change, and tackle a range of other societal challenges with greater impact than we ever thought possible.
These gains will only come, however, if informed concerns are thoroughly explored, such as whether the proposed actions will “stifle” innovation due to “overhyped dangers of AI,” or whether that innovation will make us “more fair, just, and prosperous, rather than surveilled, silenced, and stereotyped.” Putting regulations in place does not have to stifle innovation. At the same time, to believe that AI innovation should not be slowed down at all is unrealistic, and disingenuous. The pace of unchecked innovation cannot be our benchmark. Regulated innovation will be slower, but the alternative is unacceptable.
While it is important to enact regulation that will still permit us to move as quickly as possible, it’s critical that new standards and programs are informed by subject matter experts who deeply understand not just the underlying technology but specific applications, opportunities, and risks. Instead of being boiled down to “safety vs innovation,” there must be open and ongoing dialogue among the White House, Congressional leaders, developers of foundational models, innovators of new applications, and the communities impacted. This dialogue is what should inform controls and policies that both are tailored to specific risks and promote world-positive applications.
It’s vital that these measures deeply consider issues that exist in the vast grey area between two false extremes. Because doing right by the opportunities for AI and the people affected by it—for better and for worse—requires thoughtfulness, not soundbites.
Rapidly draft common legal letters and emails.
How this skill works
Specify the recipient, topic, and tone of the correspondence you want.
CoCounsel will produce a draft.
Chat back and forth with CoCounsel to edit the draft.
Get answers to your research questions, with explanations and supporting sources.
How this skill works
Enter a question or issue, along with relevant facts such as jurisdiction, area of law, etc.
CoCounsel will retrieve relevant legal resources and provide an answer with explanation and supporting sources.
Behind the scenes, Conduct Research generates multiple queries using keyword search, terms and connectors, boolean, and Parallel Search to identify the on-point case law, statutes, and regulations, reads and analyzes the search results, and outputs a summary of its findings (i.e. an answer to the question), along with the supporting sources and applicable excerpts.
Get answers to your research questions, with explanations and supporting sources.
How this skill works
Enter a question or issue, along with relevant facts such as jurisdiction, area of law, etc.
CoCounsel will retrieve relevant legal resources and provide an answer with explanation and supporting sources.
Behind the scenes, Conduct Research generates multiple queries using keyword search, terms and connectors, boolean, and Parallel Search to identify the on-point case law, statutes, and regulations, reads and analyzes the search results, and outputs a summary of its findings (i.e. an answer to the question), along with the supporting sources and applicable excerpts.
Get a thorough deposition outline in no time, just by describing the deponent and what’s at issue.
How this skill works
Describe the deponent and what’s at issue in the case, and CoCounsel identifies multiple highly relevant topics to address in the deposition and drafts questions for each topic.
Refine topics by including specific areas of interest and get a thorough deposition outline.
Ask questions of contracts that are analyzed in a line-by-line review
How this skill works
Allows the user to upload a set of contracts and a set of questions
This skill will provide an answer to those questions for each contract, or, if the question is not relevant to the contract, provide that information as well
Upload up to 10 contracts at once
Ask up to 10 questions of each contract
Relevant results will hyperlink to identified passages in the corresponding contract
Get a list of all parts of a set of contracts that don’t comply with a set of policies.
How this skill works
Upload a set of contracts and then describe a policy or set of policies that the contracts should comply with, e.g. "contracts must contain a right to injunctive relief, not merely the right to seek injunctive relief."
CoCounsel will review your contracts and identify any contractual clauses relevant to the policy or policies you specified.
If there is any conflict between a contractual clause and a policy you described, CoCounsel will recommend a revised clause that complies with the relevant policy. It will also identify the risks presented by a clause that does not conform to the policy you described.
Get an overview of any document in straightforward, everyday language.
How this skill works
Upload a document–e.g. a legal memorandum, judicial opinion, or contract.
CoCounsel will summarize the document using everyday terminology.
Find all instances of relevant information in a database of documents.
How this skill works
Select a database and describe what you're looking for in detail, such as templates and precedents to use as a starting point for drafting documents, or specific clauses and provisions you'd like to include in new documents you're working on.
CoCounsel identifies and delivers every instance of what you're searching for, citing sources in the database for each instance.
Behind the scenes, CoCounsel generates multiple queries using keyword search, terms and connectors, boolean, and Parallel Search to identifiy the on-point passages from every document in the database, reads and analyzes the search results, and outputs a summary of its findings (i.e. an answer to the question), citing applicable excerpts in specific documents.
Get a list of all parts of a set of contracts that don’t comply with a set of policies.
Ask questions of contracts that are analyzed in a line-by-line review
Get a thorough deposition outline by describing the deponent and what’s at issue.
Get answers to your research questions, with explanations and supporting sources.