0120132002
08-20-2013
Willie J. Moore, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Great Lakes Area), Agency.
Willie J. Moore,
Complainant,
v.
Patrick R. Donahoe,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Great Lakes Area),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120132002
Agency No. 4J606006713
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated March 22, 2013, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.
BACKGROUND
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Mail Processing Clerk at the Agency's Cardiss Collins Postal facility in Chicago, Illinois.
On February 21, 2013, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of disability and reprisal when, on September 28, 2012 and January 4, 2013, he received letters to bid on residual vacancies. Complainant received these letters because he was an unassigned regular.
The Agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim. The Agency noted that we had previously issued a decision on the same claim (albeit with different dates). The instant appeal followed. In his appeal, Complainant states that the Agency is discriminating against him because the positions listed have not been modified to meet his needs.1
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
In Appeal No. 0120123551 (February 22, 2013) Complainant raised the same issue when he received a letter with a list of residual vacancies on March 22, 2013. That decision find that the matter failed to state a claim. Complainant raises the same issues herein. Again, the Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the EEOC regulations because Complainant failed to show that he suffered harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Although Complainant claims to have suffered damages as a result of the incident at issue, the Commission has held that allegations that fail to state a claim cannot be converted into a viable claim merely because the complainant requests compensatory damages as a remedy. Ulanoff v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05950396 (January 26, 1996); Shrader v. Department of Agriculture, EEOC Appeal No. 01961499 (November 3, 1997).
Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.
Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
August 20, 2013
__________________
Date
1 Complainant also raised a claim of disability discrimination regarding the denial of reasonable accommodation which was subsumed into the Glee Williams v. USPS class action that is pending certification.
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
2
0120132002
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120132002