12 Cited authorities
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.
306 U.S. 240 (1939) Cited 281 timesIn Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.
Associated Press v. Labor Board
301 U.S. 103 (1937) Cited 257 timesHolding that the Associated Press's not-for-profit newsgathering activities "amount[ed] to commercial intercourse . . . within the meaning of the Constitution" because it "involve[d] the constant use of channels of interstate . . . communication"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.
94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938) Cited 178 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.
Cusano v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
190 F.2d 898 (3d Cir. 1951) Cited 35 timesNo. 10404. Argued May 22, 1951. Filed August 16, 1951. Samuel J. Davidson, Hoboken, N.J. (DeFazio, Davidson DeFazio, Hoboken, N.J., on the brief), for petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mark C. Curran, Washington, D.C., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. This case is
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Elec. City Dyeing
178 F.2d 980 (3d Cir. 1950) Cited 20 timesIn NLRB v. Electric City Dyeing Co., 178 F.2d 980 (3d Cir. 1950), this court had occasion to rule on a comparable situation where the employer alleged that certain employees were discharged for unsatisfactory work whereas the Board made a finding, in which we concurred, that the dismissals were for union activity.
National Labor Rel. Board v. Gluek Brewing Co.
144 F.2d 847 (8th Cir. 1944) Cited 26 timesIn Glueck, the court recognized that an independent contractor could not be held liable for an unfair labor practice if it was "an entirely innocent and unconscious instrument" of the perpetrator of the practice, but "[w]here an independent contractor knowingly participates in the effectuation of an unfair practice, it places itself within the orbit of the Board's corrective jurisdiction."
National Labor Rel. Board v. Ohio Calcium Co.
133 F.2d 721 (6th Cir. 1943) Cited 21 timesNo. 9217. February 19, 1943. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order against the Ohio Calcium Company. Decree in accordance with opinion. Fannie M. Boyls, of Washington, D.C. (Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Howard Lichtenstein, Ruth Weyand, and Fannie M. Boyls, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert T. Caldwell, of Ashland, Ky. (Robert T. Caldwell and Porter M
National Labor Rel. Board v. Scullin Steel Co.
161 F.2d 143 (8th Cir. 1947) Cited 13 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Scullin Steel Co., 161 F.2d 143, the Eighth Circuit held that the company was not responsible for remarks as to labor matters by minor supervisors who had no real supervisory authority, who were included among the employees eligible to vote in an election conducted in a unit of non-supervisory employees, and who were actually only key men not entitled to any additional compensation.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Westinghouse Elec
179 F.2d 507 (6th Cir. 1949) Cited 8 timesIn NLRB v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 179 F.2d 507 (6th Cir. 1949) (per curiam), we considered another case of concerted activity.