§

Vincent C. White, et al, Complainant, v. Michael L. Dominguez, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

01a42449 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 1, 2005)
Vincent C. White, et al, Complainant, v. Michael L. Dominguez, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

2 Cited authorities

  1. Gen. Tel. Co. of Sw. v. Falcon

    457 U.S. 147 (1982)   Cited 5,785 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that named plaintiff must prove “much more than the validity of his own claim”; the individual plaintiff must show that “the individual's claim and the class claims will share common questions of law or fact and that the individual's claim will be typical of the class claims,” explicitly referencing the “commonality” and “typicality” requirements of Rule 23

  2. Gen. Tel. Co. v. EEOC

    446 U.S. 318 (1980)   Cited 1,416 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the EEOC's enforcement suits should not be considered representative actions subject to Rule 23"