§

United Rubber Workers, Loc. 796

166 N.L.R.B. 165 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
United Rubber Workers, Loc. 796

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Local 542, Int'l Un. of Oper. E. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 850 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times

    No. 14286. Argued October 10, 1963. Decided March 13, 1964. Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Martin J. Vigderman, Wilfred F. Lorry, Freedman, Landy Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Leo Maguire, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Earle K. Shawe, Baltimore, Md. (Sidney J. Barban, Baltimore,

  3. Associated Home Bldr. of G. E. Bay v. N.L.R.B

    352 F.2d 745 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 13 times
    In Associated an association of builders claimed that a union's imposition of fines upon its members for exceeding a unilaterally imposed production quota violated the union members' section 7 rights and was therefore a section 8(b)(1)(A) unfair labor practice.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Dallas Gen. Drivers, L. No. 745

    264 F.2d 642 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 16 times

    No. 17172. March 12, 1959. Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Maurice Alexandre, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., Mullinax, Wells Morris, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. JONES, Circuit Judge. Associated Wholesale Grocery of Dallas, Inc., is

  5. Capital Service v. National Labor Rel. Board

    204 F.2d 848 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 22 times
    In Capital Service, Inc., v. National Labor Relations Board, 9 Cir., 204 F.2d 848, the Supreme Court granted certiorari upon this question submitted by the court: "`In view of the fact that exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter was in the National Labor Relations Board, Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers, Local Union No. 776, (A.F.L.) [ 346 U.S. 485], 74 S.Ct. 161, could the Federal District Court, on application of the Board, enjoin Petitioners from enforcing an injunction already obtained from the State court.'"