§

United Parcel Service, Inc.

17-CA-024201 (N.L.R.B. Mar. 4, 2009)
United Parcel Service, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. Sara Lee Bak. Gro. v. Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd.

    514 F.3d 422 (5th Cir. 2008)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that a "`bare assertion' of relevancy falls short" of satisfying the union's burden

  4. Mathews Readymix, Inc. v. N. L. R. B

    165 F.3d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that uncontested coercive interrogation of replacement employees did not taint the employees' signatures on the decertification petition