United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 400, CLC (Kroger Store No. 755)

7 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,214 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
  2. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 191 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause
  3. Pattern Makers' League v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    473 U.S. 95 (1985)   Cited 76 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding the NLRB's interpretation of the Act
  4. International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine & Furniture Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    41 F.3d 1532 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 43 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In IUE, the court held that the facts in the case did not make out a breach of the duty of fair representation, as there was no basis in the record to support the NLRB's finding that the Union engaged in bad faith conduct.
  5. Assoc. Bldrs. Contractors v. Carpenters

    700 F.2d 1269 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 15 times
    Concluding "supplemental dues" are "membership dues" under section 302(c) after finding dues were directed toward a permissible purpose under 8
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Distillery, Rectifying, Wine

    642 F.2d 185 (6th Cir. 1981)   Cited 2 times

    No. 79-1379. February 16, 1981. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Bruce H. Meizlish, Emil C. Farkas, Director, Region 9, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Irwin H. Cutler, Jr., Segal, Isenberg, Sales, Stewart Nutt, Louisville, Ky., Michael J. Zarzki, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before LIVELY and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and BERTELSMAN, District Judge. The Honorable William O. Bertelsman, Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Hotel, Motel Club Empl. U

    320 F.2d 254 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 17 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's finding of § 8(b) and § 8(b) violations for improper securing of employee's discharge, with no discussion of how union's conduct constitutes restraint of employee "in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7" under § 8(b)