§

UNITE HERE Local 1(Hyatt Regency Chicago)

13-CB-217959 (N.L.R.B. Sep. 26, 2019)
UNITE HERE Local 1(Hyatt Regency Chicago)

12 Cited authorities

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United States

    449 U.S. 383 (1981)   Cited 4,314 times   133 Legal Analyses
    Holding that communications between corporate counsel and a corporation's employees made for the purpose of rendering legal advice are protected by the attorney-client privilege

  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,687 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  3. John Wiley Sons v. Livingston

    376 U.S. 543 (1964)   Cited 1,773 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation

  4. City of Philadelphia v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

    205 F. Supp. 830 (E.D. Pa. 1962)   Cited 124 times
    In Westinghouse, the Third Circuit explained that selective waiver " permits the client who has disclosed privileged communications to one party to continue asserting the privilege against other parties."

  5. United States Testing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    160 F.3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 18 times
    Rejecting employer's contention that it had insufficient notice regarding the potential relevance of a union request for individual insurance claims information because "context is everything," and the employer "put on the table" the concern of growing health care costs

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Illinois-American Water Co.

    933 F.2d 1368 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that accretion is "the addition of a relatively small group of employees to an existing bargaining unit where these additional employees have a sufficient community of interest with the unit employees and have no separate identity."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. George Koch Sons, Inc.

    950 F.2d 1324 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 16 times
    Finding that employer "waived the issue of deadlock by failing to present evidence of deadlock before the ALJ"

  8. West Penn Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    394 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 2005)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 03-1984, 03-2139. Argued: June 3, 2004. Decided: January 12, 2005. Petition for review of National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: John Clark Unkovic, Reed Smith, L.L.P., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for West Penn Power Company, Potomac Edison Power Company, and Allegheny Energy Service Corporation. Joan Elizabeth Hoyte, Office of the General, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the Board. Burton E. Rosenthal, Segal, Roitman Coleman, Boston, Massachusetts, for Intervenor. ON BRIEF:

  9. Local 13, Detroit Newspaper, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    598 F.2d 267 (D.C. Cir. 1979)   Cited 24 times
    Clarifying that the good-faith requirement applies both to employer and union

  10. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    691 F.2d 953 (10th Cir. 1982)   Cited 13 times

    No. 80-2175. October 27, 1982. T. H. Eskridge of Boesche, McDermott Eskridge, Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner. Victoria A. Higman, Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel and Collis Suzanne Stocking, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D.C., with her on the brief), for respondent and cross-petitioner. Before HOLLOWAY, McWILLIAMS and BARRETT, Circuit Judges. BARRETT