§
Timken Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  2. Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 483 (1978)   Cited 221 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time

  3. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  4. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  5. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  6. Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Nat. Lbr. Relations Bd.

    144 F.3d 830 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Deferring to agency's resolution of contradictory evidence

  7. Guardian Industries Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    49 F.3d 317 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 16 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 94-2388, 94-2664. Argued January 18, 1995. Decided February 28, 1995. Todd M. Nierman (argued), Michael R. Maine, Baker Daniels, Indianapolis, IN, for petitioner. Charles P. Donnelly, Jr., Joseph Oertel (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, Saudria Bordone, Joanne Krause, N.L.R.B., Region 25, Indianapolis, IN, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before COFFEY

  8. Earle Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    75 F.3d 400 (8th Cir. 1996)   Cited 13 times
    Noting that a reviewing court “examine the [Secretary's] findings more critically” when the Secretary and ALJ disagree

  9. Timsco Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    819 F.2d 1173 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 14 times
    Upholding a Board determination that an interrogation of a non-union member was coercive based on the employer's statement that "union organizers were `going to screw up a lot of jobs for a lot of people'"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Windemuller Elec., Inc.

    34 F.3d 384 (6th Cir. 1994)   Cited 5 times

    No. 92-6240. Argued August 3, 1993. Decided September 14, 1994. Aileen A. Armstrong, Dep. Asso. Gen. Counsel, Peter Winkler (briefed), Margaret E. Luke (argued and briefed), N.L.R.B., Office of Gen. Counsel, Washington, DC, Stephen M. Glasser, Acting Regional Dir., N.L.R.B., Detroit, MI, for N.L.R.B. Peter J. Kok (argued and briefed), Elizabeth M. McIntyre (briefed), Miller, Johnson, Snell Cumminskey, Grand Rapids, MI, for Windemuller Elec., Inc. Construction Employment Services, Inc., pro se. Before: