Tiernan v. Comm'r

9 Cited authorities

Douglas v. Willcuts
296 U.S. 1 (1935) Cited 208 times
In Douglas v. Willcutts, 296 U.S. 1, 56 S.Ct. 59, 80 L.Ed. 3 (1935), a husband created a trust which became part of a divorce decree and which provided for full settlement of alimony in favor of his divorced wife.
U.S. Trust Co. v. Commissioner
296 U.S. 481 (1936) Cited 47 times
In United States Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 481, the grantor and the beneficiaries converted a single trust into several trusts, one for each of the beneficiaries, by exercising a power to amend which the grantor had expressly reserved to them.
Helvering v. Coxey
79 F.2d 661 (3d Cir. 1935) Cited 15 times
In Helvering v. Coxey, 297 U.S. 694, 56 S.Ct. 498, 80 L.Ed. 986, a divorce had been granted under the laws of New Jersey, and under those laws the husband was obligated to support his wife even after divorce.
Rennie v. Rennie
95 A. 571 (Ch. Div. 1915) Cited 15 times
In Rennie v. Rennie (1915), supra, Chancellor Walker said: "While, doubtless, the separation agreement between the parties * * * may be specifically performed, as in Aspinwall v. Aspinwall."
In re Ganey
116 A. 19 (Ch. Div. 1922) Cited 8 times
No. 50/84. 01-06-1922 In re GANEY et al. Charlton A. Reed, of Morristown, for exceptant. Milton M. Unger, of Newark, for respondents. FIELDER, V. C. Application by John J. Ganey and another for an allowance from the estate of Catherine A. Donahue, lunatic. From the report of a special master, the guardian of the lunatic brings exceptions. Exceptions sustained. Charlton A. Reed, of Morristown, for exceptant. Milton M. Unger, of Newark, for respondents. FIELDER, V. C. John J. Donahue died February
In re Rogers
96 N.J. Eq. 6 (N.J. 1924) Cited 5 times
Filed June 26th, 1924. 1. A person who applies for an order directing the guardian of any idiot, lunatic or person of unsound mind to pay over a portion of the surplus income of his or her estate, not exceeding two-thirds of such income, for her support, maintenance or education, under Comp. Stat. p. 2792 § 14m, must show that he or she is without adequate means of support and dependent upon the bounty of others. 2. No such order could be made without reasonable notice to the person to be affected
In re Rogers' Estate
125 A. 318 (Ch. Div. 1924) Cited 2 times
06-26-1924 In re ROGERS' ESTATE. Mr. Wilfred H. Jayne, Jr., of Lakewood, for petitioner. WALKER, Ch. (Syllabus by the Court.) In the matter of the estate of Jean Bard Rogers, a person of unsound mind. On petition for surplus income. Petition dismissed. Mr. Wilfred H. Jayne, Jr., of Lakewood, for petitioner. WALKER, Ch. Florence Hide Rogers has presented a petition setting forth that she is a sister of Jean Bard Rogers, who is incurably insane and is now, and for some time past has been, confined
Alling v. Alling
52 N.J. Eq. 92 (Ch. Div. 1893) Cited 23 times
10-17-1893 ALLING v. ALLING. Wm. Brinkerhoff, for complainant. J. P. Northrop, for defendant. PITNEY, V. C. (Syllabus by the Court.) Bill by Emma H. Ailing against Florence W. Ailing, by which a mother seeks to recover from the daughter for the latter's support and education, and for future support. Heard on pleadings and proofs in open court Decree for a portion of the relief sought. Wm. Brinkerhoff, for complainant. J. P. Northrop, for defendant. PITNEY, V. C. This is an undefended suit brought
Wright v. Leupp
70 N.J. Eq. 130 (Ch. Div. 1905) Cited 10 times
12-15-1905 WRIGHT et al. v. LEUPP et al. Frank Durand, for complainants. Willard P. Voorhees, for defendant Leupp. Randolph Perkins, for defendant Furniss. PITNEY, V. C. Suit by Henry J. Wright, as administrator of Hetty H. Furniss, deceased, and others, against William H. Leupp and another. Final hearing on bill, answer, and agreed statement of facts. Decree advised. Frank Durand, for complainants. Willard P. Voorhees, for defendant Leupp. Randolph Perkins, for defendant Furniss. PITNEY, V. C. The

Tiernan v. Comm'r

9 Cited authorities

In Douglas v. Willcutts, 296 U.S. 1, 56 S.Ct. 59, 80 L.Ed. 3 (1935), a husband created a trust which became part of a divorce decree and which provided for full settlement of alimony in favor of his divorced wife.

In United States Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 481, the grantor and the beneficiaries converted a single trust into several trusts, one for each of the beneficiaries, by exercising a power to amend which the grantor had expressly reserved to them.

In Helvering v. Coxey, 297 U.S. 694, 56 S.Ct. 498, 80 L.Ed. 986, a divorce had been granted under the laws of New Jersey, and under those laws the husband was obligated to support his wife even after divorce.

In Rennie v. Rennie (1915), supra, Chancellor Walker said: "While, doubtless, the separation agreement between the parties * * * may be specifically performed, as in Aspinwall v. Aspinwall."