§

The Plumbing Contractors Association of Baltimore, Maryland, Inc., et al.

93 N.L.R.B. 1081 (N.L.R.B. 1951)
The Plumbing Contractors Association of Baltimore, Maryland, Inc., et al.

5 Cited authorities

  1. International Bhd. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    181 F.2d 34 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 89 times

    No. 102, Docket 21365. Argued January 4, 1950. Decided February 24, 1950. S.A. Syme, White Plains, N.Y., L. Sherman, P.R. Collins, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. A.N. Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Robert N. Denham, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Albert M. Dreyer, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., James V. Altieri, New York City, for respondent. Louis Sherman, Washington, D.C., for Brotherhood of Elect

  2. National Labor Relations Bd. v. United BHD

    184 F.2d 60 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times

    No. 3969. August 14, 1950. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C. (Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, and A. Norman Somers, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Clif. Langsdale, Kansas City, Mo. (John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondents. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges. BRATTON, Circuit Judge. In presently pertinent part, section 8(b)(4)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, as amended by the Labor-Management

  3. Denver Bldg. Const. Tr. C. v. N.L.R.B

    186 F.2d 326 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 20 times
    In Denver Bldg., a union, petitioning for review of the NLRB's findings of an unfair labor practice, contended that a prior attempt by the NLRB to obtain a preliminary injunction from the district court, which had been denied because the alleged unfair labor practice did not affect interstate commerce, was res judicata of that issue in the present proceeding.

  4. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. L. 74, ETC

    181 F.2d 126 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 14 times

    No. 10943. April 4, 1950. Albert M. Dreyer, Washington, D.C. (Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, and Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Charles H. Tuttle, New York City (Francis X. Ward, Indianapolis, Ind., and Daniel F. O'Connell, New York City, on brief), also on docket, Herbert G.B. King, Chattanooga, Tenn., for respondents. Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. MARTIN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board

  5. Section 203 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 203   Cited 7,016 times   280 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "custom or practice" under a collective-bargaining agreement can make changing clothes noncompensable