§

The Nielsen Lithographing Co.

279 N.L.R.B. 877 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
The Nielsen Lithographing Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  3. Dallas Gen. Drivers, W. H., L. v. N.L.R.B

    355 F.2d 842 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 40 times
    Reviewing factors considered in impasse cases

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Hiney Printing Company

    733 F.2d 1170 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 83-5172, 83-5420. Argued April 2, 1984. Decided May 10, 1984. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Carol A. De Deo, Mendelssohn V. McLean (argued), Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Edward C. Kaminski (argued), Akron, Ohio, for respondent. Before EDWARDS and JONES, Circuit Judges, and GIBSON, District Judge. Honorable Benjamin F. Gibson, United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM. The sole issue in this case is presented by

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Western Wirebound Box Co.

    356 F.2d 88 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 19 times
    Analyzing ALJ decision in light of Truitt cautionary language