§

The Musical Arts Association

08-CA-038834 (N.L.R.B. Jan. 13, 2011)
The Musical Arts Association

11 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,687 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. Strand Theatre v. N.L.R.B

    493 F.3d 515 (5th Cir. 2007)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that presenting a union with a ` fait accompli . . . unilaterally inform[ing] the [u]nion that position had already been eliminated" violated a union's right to bargaining provided by the Act

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Tahoe Nugget, Inc.

    584 F.2d 293 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 58 times
    In Tahoe Nugget and Sahara-Tahoe we stressed that the evidence presented to establish reasonable good faith doubt, individually or cumulatively, must unequivocally indicate that union support had declined to a minority.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. General Electric Company

    418 F.2d 736 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 63 times
    Offering better terms to union locals while bargaining with the unions' national bargaining representative

  7. United Elec. Workers v. N.L.R.B

    986 F.2d 70 (4th Cir. 1993)   Cited 6 times
    Holding duty to bargain exists only with certified local bargaining unit, not its uncertified international

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Ozanne Constr

    112 F.3d 219 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 1 times

    No. 95-6058 Argued October 10, 1996. Decided and Filed February 24, 1997 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 24 This decision was originally issued as an "unpublished decision" filed on February 24, 1997. On March 27, 1997, the court designated the opinion as one recommended for full-text publication. Nancy B. Hunt (briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Asso. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, John Burgoyne (argued), National Labor

  9. Gibbs & Cox, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    904 F.2d 214 (4th Cir. 1990)

    No. 86-3128. Argued February 7, 1990. Decided June 1, 1990. Ann Gordon Greever (argued), Hill B. Wellford, Jr., on brief, Hunton Williams, Richmond, Va., for petitioner. David A. Fleischer (argued), Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, on brief, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from National Labor Relation Board. Before RUSSELL, WIDENER, and HALL, Circuit Judges. DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge: This long-standing labor dispute is today resolved by our finding

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Carda Hotels, Inc.

    604 F.2d 605 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 4 times

    No. 77-2312. August 24, 1979. Rehearing Denied October 1, 1979. Eric G. Moskowitz, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. William W. Wertz, Severson, Werson, Berke Melchior, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. An Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge. The Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge, District of Oregon, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §