§

The Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paper Hangers of America

99 N.L.R.B. 1391 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
The Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paper Hangers of America

21 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Laughlin

    301 U.S. 1 (1937)   Cited 1,502 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. Labor Board v. Fainblatt

    306 U.S. 601 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    Upholding NLRA under Commerce Power

  4. Fox v. Standard Oil Co.

    294 U.S. 87 (1935)   Cited 201 times
    Affirming the District Court's conclusion that a "resort to equity was permissible" where there "was an imperfect remedy at law"; complainant sought to "restrain the state tax commissioner from paying into the treasury" license taxes paid under protest and requested both "interlocutory and permanent relief"

  5. Polish Alliance v. Labor Board

    322 U.S. 643 (1944)   Cited 138 times
    In Polish National Alliance v. NLRB, 322 U.S. 643, 64 S.Ct. 1196, 88 L.Ed. 1509 (1944), the Court held that the National Labor Relations Act applied to a fraternal organization providing death, disability and accident benefits to its members and their beneficiaries.

  6. Carpenters Union v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 707 (1951)   Cited 89 times
    In Carpenters Union v. Labor Board, 341 U.S. 707, 71 S.Ct. 966, 971, supra, the Supreme Court said: "The use of such pressure on this renovation project was merely a sample of what might be repeated elsewhere if not prohibited. The underlying dispute between petitioners and Watson's has not been shown to have been resolved."

  7. Ex Parte Public Bank

    278 U.S. 101 (1928)   Cited 122 times
    In Ex parte Public National Bank of New York, 278 U.S. 101, 104, 49 S.Ct. 43, 44, 73 L.Ed. 202, is stated: "No rule of statutory construction has been more definitely stated or more often repeated than the cardinal rule that `significance and effect shall, if possible, be accorded to every word.

  8. United Bhd. of Carpenters, Etc. v. Sperry

    170 F.2d 863 (10th Cir. 1948)   Cited 55 times
    In Carpenters District Council v. Sperry ex rel. NLRB, 170 F.2d 863, 868-69 (1948), the United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, addressed the claim of the defendant union that its peaceful picketing and blacklisting of a construction company was protected by the First Amendment.

  9. Shore v. Building Constr. Trades Council

    173 F.2d 678 (3d Cir. 1949)   Cited 37 times

    No. 9823. Argued February 23, 1949. Decided March 4, 1949. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Robert M. Gibson, Judge. Proceeding by Henry Shore, regional director of the sixth region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board against the Building Construction Trades Council of Pittsburgh, Pa. and others, to restrain certain alleged unfair labor practices under the Labor Management Relations Act

  10. Printing Specialties & Paper Converters Union v. Le Baron

    171 F.2d 331 (9th Cir. 1949)   Cited 36 times

    No. 11894. December 13, 1948. Rehearing Denied January 19, 1949. Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Paul J. McCormick, Judge. Proceeding by Howard F. Le Baron, Regional Director of the Twenty-First Region of the National Labor Relations Board, on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, against Printing Specialties and Paper Converters Union, Local 388, A.F.L., and another, to enjoin alleged unfair labor practices in violation