§

TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING CO.

18-CA-019615 (N.L.R.B. Feb. 7, 2012)
TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING CO.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    501 U.S. 190 (1991)   Cited 801 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits

  2. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,563 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

  3. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 631 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  4. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Mullins

    455 U.S. 72 (1982)   Cited 362 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, if a contract to contribute to union funds arose from an obligation that was illegal under the antitrust or labor laws, enforcing that contract would command unlawful conduct

  5. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 313 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  6. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    8 F.3d 832 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 51 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Upholding postal service's exercise of contractual right to reduce employees' hours in response to budget reduction

  7. BP Amoco Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    217 F.3d 869 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 18 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statement in a collective-bargaining agreement that "Benefit plans for the Company ... will continue in force during the life of this Agreement" was sufficient to incorporate the company’s health-insurance plan by reference (alteration in original)

  8. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Hardesty Co., Inc.

    308 F.3d 859 (8th Cir. 2002)   Cited 12 times
    Noting that hardline bargaining positions can be evidence that an employer "had no intention of reaching an agreement"

  10. Chesapeake Potomac Telephone Co. v. N.L.R.B

    687 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that waiver of statutory rights can be effectuated only if "intent to waive is clear and unmistakable from the evidence presented"