Teamsters Local 282 (E.G. Clemente Contracting)

10 Cited authorities

  1. Mine Workers v. Pennington

    381 U.S. 657 (1965)   Cited 1,641 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that immunity extends to petitioning conduct “either standing alone or as part of a broader scheme”
  2. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 115 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"
  4. Florida Power Light v. Electrical Workers

    417 U.S. 790 (1974)   Cited 96 times
    In Florida Power Light Co. v. IBEW, Local 641, 417 U.S. 790, 804-05, 94 S.Ct. 2737, 2744-45, 41 L.Ed.2d 477 (1974), the Supreme Court held that no § 8(b)(1)(B) violation occurs unless the disciplined conduct adversely affects the performance of his or her § 8(b)(1)(B) duties.
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 340

    481 U.S. 573 (1987)   Cited 33 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding union's policy of fining members who worked for employers not part of a CBA with the union to not constitute an unfair labor practice
  6. Kankakee-Iroquois Cty. Employers' v. N.L.R.B

    825 F.2d 1091 (7th Cir. 1987)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 86-1627. Argued December 11, 1986. Decided June 19, 1987. Karl W. Grabemann, McDermott, Will Emery, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. John Burgoyne, Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., William A. Widmer, III, Carmell, Charone, Widmer Mathews, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for respondents. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before BAUER, Chief Judge, COFFEY and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges. COFFEY, Circuit Judge. On appeal, petitioner Kankakee-Iroquois County Employers' Association ("KICEA")

  7. Teamsters Local Union No. 515 v. N.L.R.B

    906 F.2d 719 (D.C. Cir. 1990)   Cited 11 times
    Emphasizing that "rigid adherence to disadvantageous proposals may provide a basis for inferring bad faith"
  8. Graphic Arts Int'l U., L. No. 280 v. N.L.R.B

    596 F.2d 904 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 10 times

    No. 78-1950. May 14, 1979. David A. Rosenfeld, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Walter C. Schumann, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHOY and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and INGRAM, District Judge. The Honorable William A. Ingram, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. CHOY, Circuit Judge: Graphic Arts International Union, Local 280 (Union or Local 280) petitions for

  9. Oil, Chem. Atomic Wkrs. Intern. v. N.L.R.B

    538 F.2d 1199 (5th Cir. 1976)   Cited 3 times

    No. 75-4328. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. September 20, 1976. Dennis M. Angelico, Victor H. Hess, Jr., New Orleans, La., for petitioner. Paul J. Spielberg, John C. Rother, Attys., John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Lawrence J. Molony, Terence E. Hall, New

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Warehousemen's Union Local 17, International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union

    451 F.2d 1240 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 6 times
    Upholding Board remedial order requiring union to make employer whole for financial expenditures made by employer as result of an unlawfully coerced collective bargaining agreement