§

Talking Car, Inc.

No. 75121820 (T.T.A.B. Jul. 3, 2001)
Talking Car, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Golden Door, Inc. v. Odisho

    646 F.2d 347 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 80 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming the grant of an injunction for plaintiff despite the absence of evidence of actual consumer confusion

  2. Application of Abcor Development Corp.

    588 F.2d 811 (C.C.P.A. 1978)   Cited 36 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Abcor, the question before the court was whether applicant's alleged mark (GASBADGE) was "merely descriptive" within the meaning of § 2(e)(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(1).

  3. West Co., Inc. v. Arica Institute, Inc.

    557 F.2d 338 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 31 times
    Referring to the line between suggestive and descriptive as “the broad middle ground where most of the trademark battles are fought”

  4. In re Gyulay

    820 F.2d 1216 (Fed. Cir. 1987)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the Board did not err in affirming the examiner's prima facie case that the mark was merely descriptive

  5. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,607 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"