Sylvia K. Franklin, Complainant,v.Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 18, 2013
0520120545 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 18, 2013)

0520120545

01-18-2013

Sylvia K. Franklin, Complainant, v. Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Sylvia K. Franklin,

Complainant,

v.

Ray Mabus,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Request No. 0520120545

Appeal No. 0120121637

Agency No. 12-00019-00455

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Sylvia K. Franklin v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. 0120121637 (June 20, 2012). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

The previous decision affirmed the Agency's dismissal of Complainant's complaint for untimely EEO contact. The decision noted that the actions about which Complainant complained occurred from November 1980 through November 1989, when Complainant retired from the Agency. Her EEO contact was on October 17, 2011. It also found that she had not presented adequate justification for the delay of over 20 years in contacting an EEO Counselor.

In her request for reconsideration, Complainant discussed her medical conditions at length. The Agency submitted a statement in opposition to Complainant's request for reconsideration, in which it urged the Commission to deny Complainant's request.

We find that Complainant's request for reconsideration fails to show that our previous decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or that it would have a substantial impact on the policies, practices or operations of the Agency. We note that a "request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission." E.g., Lopez v. Dep't of Agriculture, EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007); EEO Management Directive for Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), Chap. 9, �VII.A. (Nov. 9, 1999). Complainant has not specifically argued or shown that the previous decision was erroneous.

Therefore, after reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to DENY the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120121637 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 18, 2013

Date

2

0520120543

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0520120545