Sushma D. Sodhi, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 18, 2008
0120083112 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 18, 2008)

0120083112

09-18-2008

Sushma D. Sodhi, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Sushma D. Sodhi,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120083112

Agency No. 1F957001908

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated June 4, 2008, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim.

In a complaint dated May 23, 2008, complainant alleged that she was

subjected to discrimination on the bases of race (Asian), sex (female),

and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity under Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964 when she was assigned to work without a partner,

she was sent to work in the primary section, and when she was subjected

to job discussion during which allegedly false statements were made.

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the

EEOC regulations because complainant failed to show that she suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Regarding complainant's

claim of reprisal, the Commission has stated that adverse actions need

not qualify as "ultimate employment actions" or materially affect the

terms and conditions of employment to constitute retaliation. Lindsey

v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05980410 (Nov. 4, 1999)

(citing EEOC Compliance Manual, No. 915.003 (May 20, 1998)). Instead,

the statutory retaliation clauses prohibit any adverse treatment that

is based upon a retaliatory motive and is reasonably likely to deter

the charging party or others from engaging in protected activity. Id.

The Commission finds that the actions complained of are not sufficient

to claim a viable claim of unlawful retaliation. Moreover, to the extent

complainant is claiming a discriminatory hostile work environment, we find

that the events described, even if proven to be true, would not indicate

that complainant has been subjected to harassment that was sufficiently

severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of her employment. See Cobb

v. Department of the Treasury, Request No. 05970077 (March 13, 1997).

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 18, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120083112

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120083112