Superx Drugs, Inc.
2 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Superior Cable
246 F.2d 539 (4th Cir. 1957) Cited 1 timesNo. 7426. Argued June 4, 1957. Decided July 6, 1957. Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Alice Andrews, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Young M. Smith, Hickory, N.C., for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a