§

Sun Up Int’l. Corp.

No. 75478836 (T.T.A.B. Oct. 11, 2000)
Sun Up Int’l. Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 190 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

  2. In re Nat. Data Corp.

    753 F.2d 1056 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 73 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "likelihood of confusion cannot be predicated on dissection of a mark"

  3. Federated Foods v. Fort Howard Paper Co.

    544 F.2d 1098 (C.C.P.A. 1976)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the mere existence of modern supermarket containing wide variety or products should not foreclose further inquiry into the likelihood of confusion arising from the use of similar marks on any goods so displayed

  4. Faultless Starch Co. v. Sales Prod. Assoc

    530 F.2d 1400 (C.C.P.A. 1976)   Cited 1 times

    Patent Appeal No. 75-618. March 11, 1976. Joseph B. Bowman, Kansas City, Mo. (Lowe, Kokjer, Kircher, Wharton Bowman, Kansas City, Mo.), atty. of record, for appellant. Robert D. Hovey, Kansas City, Mo., atty. of record, for appellee. Schmidt, Johnson, Hovey Williams, Kansas City, Mo., of counsel. Appeal from the Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges. MARKEY, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from the decision

  5. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,605 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"