Stewart Oil Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. J.I. Case Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 332 (1944)   Cited 457 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"
  2. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
  3. Western Air Lines v. Pub. Uti. Commn

    342 U.S. 908 (1952)   Cited 19 times

    No. 465. January 7, 1952, October TERM, 1951. Appeals from the Supreme Court of California. Per Curiam: The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE BURTON are of the opinion probable jurisdiction should be noted. Oscar A. Trippet and Paul M. Godehn for appellant in No. 464. Hugh W. Darling for appellant in No. 465. Everett C. McKeage for appellee.

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Ken Rose Motors

    193 F.2d 769 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 6 times

    No. 4605. January 21, 1952. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Abraham Siegel, Attorney, all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Edmund J. Blake, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act, as amended

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Everett Van Kleeck

    189 F.2d 516 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 3 times

    No. 202, Docket 21903. Argued May 8, 1951. Decided May 31, 1951. George P. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Harvey B. Diamond and George H. Plaut, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. Adolph Bangser, New York City, for respondent. Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND and CLARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The decision and order under review affirms the Trial Examiner's conclusion

  6. Section 207 - Maximum hours

    29 U.S.C. § 207   Cited 10,831 times   231 Legal Analyses
    Establishing overtime rules