Stericycle, Inc.

19 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 712 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
441 U.S. 488 (1979) Cited 290 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that proposal concerning in-plant cafeteria prices was within duty to bargain despite fact that prices were set by third-party supplier rather than employer
Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
440 U.S. 301 (1979) Cited 228 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.
351 U.S. 105 (1956) Cited 294 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
Labor Board v. Electrical Workers
346 U.S. 464 (1953) Cited 125 times 41 Legal Analyses
Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute
Frankl v. HTH Corp.
693 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 2012) Cited 31 times
Holding that employer withheld requested documents in bad faith where union repeatedly explained why limited production was inadequate and where union signed confidentiality agreement to address employer’s concerns
N.L.R.B. v. A-Plus Roofing, Inc.
39 F.3d 1410 (9th Cir. 1994) Cited 58 times
Holding that a magistrate judge did not have authority under § 636(b) to conduct criminal contempt trial without consent of defendant
Newsday v. Long Island Typographical Union
915 F.2d 840 (2d Cir. 1990) Cited 64 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the arbitrator's "award of reinstatement completely disregarded the public policy against sexual harassment in the work place," when, in the same decision, the arbitrator found "no doubt" that the employee inappropriately touched female co-workers
Stephens Media, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
677 F.3d 1241 (D.C. Cir. 2012) Cited 19 times
Applying the Bennett standard to cross-petitions for enforcement and review under Section 10(e) and 10(f)
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,099 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Stericycle, Inc.

19 Cited authorities

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that proposal concerning in-plant cafeteria prices was within duty to bargain despite fact that prices were set by third-party supplier rather than employer

Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

Holding that employer withheld requested documents in bad faith where union repeatedly explained why limited production was inadequate and where union signed confidentiality agreement to address employer’s concerns

Holding that a magistrate judge did not have authority under § 636(b) to conduct criminal contempt trial without consent of defendant

Holding that the arbitrator's "award of reinstatement completely disregarded the public policy against sexual harassment in the work place," when, in the same decision, the arbitrator found "no doubt" that the employee inappropriately touched female co-workers

Applying the Bennett standard to cross-petitions for enforcement and review under Section 10(e) and 10(f)

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"