§

Stemilt Growers, Inc.

336 N.L.R.B. 987 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Stemilt Growers, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    638 F.2d 676 (4th Cir. 1980)   Cited 15 times
    Recognizing significance of employer's history of § 8 violations

  5. Asociacion Hosp. Del Maestro, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    842 F.2d 575 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 4 times

    No. 87-1476. Heard December 7, 1987. Decided March 30, 1988. Roberto E. Vega-Pacheco with whom Roberto O. Maldonado Nieves and Cancio, Nadal Rivera, Hato Rey, P.R., were on brief, for petitioner. Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., with whom Harriet Lipkin, Rosemary M. Collyer, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition