§

SQUIRE CORRUGATED BOX COMPANY

22-CA-104475 (N.L.R.B. Jan. 13, 2014)
SQUIRE CORRUGATED BOX COMPANY

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 116 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. P*I*E Nationwide, Inc.

    923 F.2d 506 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that National Labor Relations Board's attempt to reduce a claim to judgment did not run afoul of the governmental unit exception to the automatic stay

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Continental Hagen Corp.

    932 F.2d 828 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 50 times
    Finding NLRB's distinction between the entry of judgment and the enforcement of that judgment convincing and supported by the case law with regard to back pay claims

  4. Neca–Ibew Pension Trust Fund v. Bays Elec., Inc.

    894 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (C.D. Ill. 2012)   Cited 6 times
    Holding non-signatory entity liable for contribution obligations on both alter ego and single employer liability theories

  5. Capitol City Lumber Co. v. N.L.R.B

    721 F.2d 546 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 82-1682, 82-1850. Argued October 13, 1983. Decided November 11, 1983. Certiorari Denied February 21, 1984. Thomas A. Bengtson, argued, Hubbard, Fox, Thomas, White Bengtson, Lansing, Mich., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Robert Tendrich, argued, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MARTIN and CONTIE, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. Capitol City Lumber Company

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second

  7. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,335 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  8. Section 1145 - Delinquent contributions

    29 U.S.C. § 1145   Cited 2,775 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that employers contribute according to the terms of plans only "to the extent not inconsistent with law"