Southern Calif. Pipe Trades Dist. Council 16

17 Cited authorities

National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
386 U.S. 612 (1967) Cited 392 times
Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"
Labor Board v. Fruit Packers
377 U.S. 58 (1964) Cited 236 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"
Allen Bradley Co. v. Union
325 U.S. 797 (1945) Cited 304 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the defendants were not protected by the statutory labor exemption because the union had combined with contractors and manufacturers in order to boycott the plaintiffs' business
Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board
357 U.S. 93 (1958) Cited 201 times
Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers
400 U.S. 297 (1971) Cited 73 times
Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work
Douds v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n
242 F.2d 808 (2d Cir. 1957) Cited 48 times
No. 154, Docket 24277. Argued January 16, 1957. Decided March 15, 1957. Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate General Counsel, Washington, D.C. (Winthrop A. Johns, Asst. General Counsel, of counsel), William W. Kapell, Philadelphia, Pa., and Walter N. Moldawer, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner-appellant. John T. Sullivan, New York City, for respondents-appellees. Before MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit
N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro. of Elec. Wkrs
405 F.2d 159 (9th Cir. 1968) Cited 25 times
In NLRB v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 405 F.2d at 162, this court held that only that part of a contract that exceeds the limits of the construction industry provision is negated.
Local No. 5, United Ass'n v. N.L.R.B
321 F.2d 366 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Cited 21 times
No. 17130. Argued March 26, 1963. Decided June 6, 1963. Mr. Donald J. Capuano, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel at the time of argument, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers
326 F.2d 213 (3d Cir. 1964) Cited 20 times
No. 14331. Argued October 10, 1963. Decided January 8, 1964. Solomon Hirsh, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, James McC. Harkless, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Mooney, New York City (Michael Breitkopf, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for respondent. Before STALEY, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor
Local U. No. 636 v. N.L.R.B
430 F.2d 906 (D.C. Cir. 1970) Cited 13 times
No. 23342. Argued June 12, 1970. Decided July 29, 1970. Mr. Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Ian D. Lanoff, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty

Southern Calif. Pipe Trades Dist. Council 16

17 Cited authorities

Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"

Holding that the defendants were not protected by the statutory labor exemption because the union had combined with contractors and manufacturers in order to boycott the plaintiffs' business

Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work

In NLRB v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 405 F.2d at 162, this court held that only that part of a contract that exceeds the limits of the construction industry provision is negated.