Smiths Industries

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Keystone Steel Wire v. N.L.R.B
41 F.3d 746 (D.C. Cir. 1994) Cited 4 times
No. 93-1357. Argued November 8, 1994. Decided December 16, 1994. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Mark G. Arnold, St. Louis, MO, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. William M. Bernstein, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linda R. Sher, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC. Before WALD, GINSBURG and TATEL, Circuit
N.L.R.B. v. Pacific Coast Utilities Service
638 F.2d 73 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 1 times
In NLRB v. Pacific Coast Utilities Service, Inc., 638 F.2d 73 (9th Cir. 1980), we enforced a Board order granting backpay against both the employer and the union when substantial evidence in the record supported the Board's findings of both wrongful discharge and breach of duty of fair representation.