Shondra H.,1 Complainant,v.James F. Bridenstine, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Ames Research Center), Agency.Download PDFEqual Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 16, 20202020004608 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 16, 2020) Copy Citation U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Shondra H.,1 Complainant, v. James F. Bridenstine, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Ames Research Center), Agency. Appeal No. 2020004608 Hearing No. 550-2020-00487X Agency No. NCN-20-ARC-00062 DECISION Complainant filed a timely appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) from the Agency's decision dated August 18, 2020, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. BACKGROUND At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant was an applicant for employment with the Agency. On April 30, 2020, Complainant filed a request for a hearing (docketed as EEOC Hearing No. 550- 2020-00344X) before an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ). The Agency responded on May 7, 2020, notifying the AJ that Complainant had not yet contacted an Agency EEO counselor or filed a formal EEO complaint. On May 29, 2020, the AJ dismissed the hearing request as premature. On May 11, 2020, Complainant initiated contact with the Agency’s EEO office. On June 9, 2020, Complainant filed a formal EEO complaint alleging she was discriminated against on the basis of 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 2020004608 2 disability when, on February 10, 2020, she learned she was not referred for selection for a GS-11, Equal Employment Opportunity position, advertised under Vacancy Announcement Ar20C0020. On August 18, 2020, the Agency issued its decision dismissing the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact. The instant appeal followed. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action. The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event occurred on February 10, 2020, but Complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until May 11, 2020, which is beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period. On appeal, Complainant has presented no persuasive argument or evidence warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact. Even if we were to consider Complainant’s April 30, 2020 request for a hearing as her initial EEO counselor contact, which we do not, she would still be beyond the 45-day time limit from the date (February 10, 2020) she asserts she first learned of her non-selection. Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.2 STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL RECONSIDERATION (M0620) The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider this appellate decision if the complainant or the agency submits a written request that contains arguments or evidence that tend to establish that: 1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or 2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. Requests for reconsideration must be filed with EEOC’s Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision. If the party requesting reconsideration elects to file a statement or brief in support of the request, that statement or brief must be filed together with the request for reconsideration. 2 The record indicates that Complainant filed a second request for a hearing (docketed as EEOC Hearing No. 550-2020-00487X) on August 19, 2020, the day after the Agency’s dismissal decision was issued. By Order of Dismissal dated August 27, 2020, the AJ again dismissed this request because of the Agency’s previously issued final decision and the instant pending appeal. This action by the AJ was correct. 2020004608 3 A party shall have twenty (20) calendar days from receipt of another party’s request for reconsideration within which to submit a brief or statement in opposition. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 § VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). Complainant should submit his or her request for reconsideration, and any statement or brief in support of his or her request, via the EEOC Public Portal, which can be found at https://publicportal.eeoc.gov/Portal/Login.aspx. Alternatively, complainant can submit his or her request and arguments to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, via regular mail addressed to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail addressed to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a legible postmark, complainant’s request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if OFO receives it by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. An agency’s request for reconsideration must be submitted in digital format via the EEOC’s Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g). Either party’s request and/or statement or brief in opposition must also include proof of service on the other party, unless complainant files his or her request via the EEOC Public Portal, in which case no proof of service is required. Failure to file within the 30-day time period will result in dismissal of the party’s request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted together with the request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c). COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610) You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. 2020004608 4 Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations November 16, 2020 Date Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation