§

Shinnecock Smoke Shop

No. 78918500 (T.T.A.B. Sep. 10, 2008)
Shinnecock Smoke Shop

9 Cited authorities

  1. Johnson v. Quander

    440 F.3d 489 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 85 times
    Holding that the Government's access to a database containing a defendant's “genetic fingerprint” lawfully collected while he was on probation after the defendant's probation terminated and for a different purpose did not constitute a separate search for Fourth Amendment purposes

  2. Johnson v. Quander

    370 F. Supp. 2d 79 (D.D.C. 2005)   Cited 68 times
    Holding that DNA Act violates neither substantive nor procedural due process under the Fifth Amendment

  3. In re Nett Designs, Inc.

    236 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2001)   Cited 28 times
    Finding that prior registrations of marks including the term ULTIMATE "do not conclusively rebut the Board's finding that ULTIMATE is descriptive in the context of this mark"

  4. In re Rath

    402 F.3d 1207 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 04-1419, 04-1420, 75/753,445, 75/753,597. March 24, 2005. Roy S. Gordet, San Francisco, California, for appellant. John M. Whealan, Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were Cynthia C. Lynch and Nancy C. Slutter, Associate Solicitors. Of counsel on the brief were Lois E. Boland, Director, and Amy P. Cotton, Staff Attorney, Office of International Relations. Before

  5. In re Boulevard Entertainment, Inc.

    334 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2003)   Cited 9 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Affirming refusal to register JACK–OFF marks

  6. University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co.

    703 F.2d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 1983)   Cited 20 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co., 703 F.2d 1372, 1376, 217 USPQ 505, 509 (Fed. Cir. 1983), the court added that section 2(a) embraces concepts of the right to privacy which may be violated even in the absence of likelihood of confusion.

  7. Section 1127 - Construction and definitions; intent of chapter

    15 U.S.C. § 1127   Cited 3,028 times   99 Legal Analyses
    Granting standing under § 1114 to the legal representative of the registrant of a trademark

  8. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,605 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"

  9. Section 2.142 - Time and manner of ex parte appeals

    37 C.F.R. § 2.142   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) (1) An appeal filed under the provisions of § 2.141(a) from the final refusal of an application must be filed within the time provided in § 2.62(a) . (2) An appeal filed under the provisions of § 2.141(b) from an expungement or reexamination proceeding must be filed within three months from the issue date of the final Office action. (3) An appeal is taken by filing a notice of appeal, as prescribed in § 2.126 , and paying the appeal fee. (b) (1) The brief of appellant shall be filed within sixty