Sheryl Taylor, Complainant,v.Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 10, 2008
0520080719 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 10, 2008)

0520080719

09-10-2008

Sheryl Taylor, Complainant, v. Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


Sheryl Taylor,

Complainant,

v.

Henry M. Paulson, Jr.,

Secretary,

Department of the Treasury,

Agency.

Request No. 0520080719

Appeal No. 0120073058

Agency No. C13MEM05057

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Sheryl

Taylor v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. 0120073058 (July

25, 2008). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its

discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision

where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision

involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

(2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In the appellate decision, complainant claimed breach of a July 19, 2005,

settlement agreement. The Commission found that the record was inadequate

to determine whether the agency had breached the settlement agreement.

The Commission also noted that complainant alleged that the agency was

prohibited from sharing the information regarding her suspension under

the terms of the settlement agreement. Therefore, the Commission remanded

this matter to the agency for a supplemental investigation.

In her request for reconsideration, complainant contends that the

Commission erred when it found that there was not adequate information

in the file to determine if the agency had breached the settlement

agreement. Complainant contends that she forwarded to the Office of

Federal Operations documentation entitled Department of Treasury Final

Agency Decision, dated November 1, 2006, wherein the agency admitted to

breaching item 1 (a) of the settlement agreement. Moreover, complainant

contends that she would not have signed a settlement agreement that

provided for the removal of information regarding the subject suspension

from her personnel file that then allowed the information to be forwarded

to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). Complainant believes that

the agency's action is an additional act of retaliation.

After reconsidering the previous decision and the entire record, the

Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny

the request. We find that complainant has not shown that the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law, or that the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on

the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. Notwithstanding,

the Commission modifies its previous order to require the agency to

produce the agency's Final Agency Decision dated November 1, 2006.

Accordingly, the decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120073058 with the

addition of the modified order remains the Commission's final decision.

There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of

the Commission on this request.

ORDER

The agency is ordered to take the following action:

The agency shall conduct a supplemental investigation, which shall

include a determination as to whether the documents provided by

complainant from OPM were from sources from which the terms of

the settlement agreement required information of complainant's

suspension be expunged and whether it breached the settlement

agreement by providing OPM with that information. The agency shall

also produce the agency's Final Agency Decision dated November 1,

2006, regarding the allegation of breach of Settlement Agreement.

Thereafter, but no later than 30 days after the date of this

decision, the agency shall issue a final decision on the issue of

whether it breached the settlement agreement of July 19, 2005.

Copies must be submitted to the Compliance Officer, as referenced

herein.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0408)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the

sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not

extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and

the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the

paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action")).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

09-10-08

__________________

Date

2

0520080719

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

4

0520080719