Service Employees Local 9 (American Maintenance)

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

    391 U.S. 418 (1968)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution
  2. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred
  4. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 925

    460 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 37 times

    No. 71-2158. May 17, 1972. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., Stanley R. Zirkin, Nancy M. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank E. Hamilton, Jr., Thomas A. Capelle, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge: The

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Central Power Light Company

    425 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Central Pwr. Light Co., 425 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1970), the original charge alleged a discriminatory discharge of an employee and stated the company had violated section 7 rights "by other acts and conduct."
  7. N.L.R.B. v. L. 139, Int'l Union of Op. Engin

    796 F.2d 985 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 6 times
    Stating that the union must serve the interests of all members in negotiating and administering a collective bargaining agreement
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Carpenters Local 608

    811 F.2d 149 (2d Cir. 1987)   Cited 3 times

    No. 621, Docket 86-4107. Argued January 7, 1987. Decided February 10, 1987. Ira Sturm, New York City (Manning, Raab, Dealy Sturm, of counsel), for respondent. Frederick Havard, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. Petition for review from the

  9. Plumbers Local U. No. 17, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    575 F.2d 585 (6th Cir. 1978)   Cited 2 times

    No. 76-2059. May 4, 1978. Patrick Johnson, Jr., Robert A. Tillman, Jim B. Johnson, Johnson, Johnson Johnson, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Jay Shanklin, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Raymond A. Jacobson, Director, Region 26, N.L.R.B., Memphis, Tenn., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CELEBREZZE, LIVELY and KEITH, Circuit Judges. ORDER The petitioner has filed an application to review and set aside an order

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Hotel Conquistador, Inc.

    398 F.2d 430 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 8 times
    Discussing the principle that additional allegations in an NLRB case must be "closely related" to those contained in the original charge for the NLRB to be able to resolve the new dispute
  11. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions