Securitas Security Services USA

Midwest Div. MMC, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
867 F.3d 1288 (D.C. Cir. 2017) Cited 7 times 3 Legal Analyses
Concluding that a hospital committed unfair labor practice by refusing to disclose "information about allegations investigated by the [hospital's peer review committee]" because the "information could have substantial relevance to the Union's representation of affected employees" and that interest outweighed the hospital's confidentiality interest as provided by state statute prohibiting disclosure
Banner Health Sys. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
851 F.3d 35 (D.C. Cir. 2017) Cited 3 times 1 Legal Analyses
Explaining that restrictions on employees' communications cannot sweep "so broadly as to include working conditions"
Hyundai Am. Shipping Agency, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
805 F.3d 309 (D.C. Cir. 2015) Cited 2 times
Declining to endorse the Board's "novel view" but holding that Hyundai's rule prohibiting discussion of all matters under investigation "was so broad and undifferentiated that the Board reasonably concluded that Hyundai did not present a legitimate business justification for it"
Aroostook County v. N.L.R.B
81 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 18 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding NLRB's jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 158, part of the National Labor Relations Act, over an employer