§

Scruples Professional Salon Products, Inc.

No. 75079106 (T.T.A.B. Jan. 4, 1999)
Scruples Professional Salon Products, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Application of Abcor Development Corp.

    588 F.2d 811 (C.C.P.A. 1978)   Cited 36 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Abcor, the question before the court was whether applicant's alleged mark (GASBADGE) was "merely descriptive" within the meaning of § 2(e)(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(1).

  2. Application of Realistic Company

    440 F.2d 1393 (C.C.P.A. 1971)   Cited 6 times

    Patent Appeal No. 8529. May 13, 1971. Roy F. Schaeperklaus, Cincinnati, Ohio, attorney of record, for appellants. William A. Smith, Jr., Washington, D.C., of counsel. S. Wm. Cochran, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Betty Hedrick Vertiz, Arlington, Va., of counsel. Before RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and SKELTON, Judge, sitting by designation. ALMOND, Judge. This appeal is from a decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 159 USPQ 445 (1968), affirming the examiner's

  3. Fleetwood Company v. Mende

    298 F.2d 797 (C.C.P.A. 1962)   Cited 5 times
    In Fleetwood Company v. Mende, 298 F.2d 797, 49 CCPA 907 (1962), the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals reviewed a decision of the Patent Office Board dismissing a petition by Fleetwood for cancellation of the mark TINT'N SET, and held that there was no likelihood of confusion or mistake between that mark and Fleetwood's prior registered mark, TINTZ, for similar products sold in the same channels of trade.

  4. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,605 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"