§

Sander Operating Company III, LLC, d/b/a KGW-TV

19-CA-148474 (N.L.R.B. Dec. 20, 2016)
Sander Operating Company III, LLC, d/b/a KGW-TV

16 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  3. St. George Warehouse, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    420 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2005)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that under a substantial evidence standard of review, an administrative fact-finder's determinations on issues of credibility should not be reversed unless inherently incredible or patently unreasonable

  4. Rush Univ. Med. Ctr. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    833 F.3d 202 (D.C. Cir. 2016)   Cited 6 times
    Finding that NLRB did not arbitrarily decide to uphold its Regional Director's determination that PCTs constituted an appropriate voting group for self-determination to join the bargaining unit

  5. Asarco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    86 F.3d 1401 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 22 times
    Finding of antiunion animus necessary to finding of section 8 violation

  6. L.S.F. Transp., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    282 F.3d 972 (7th Cir. 2002)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 00-2040, 00-2289. Argued November 29, 2001. Decided March 11, 2002. Petitioned for review of, and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Walter J. Liszka (argued), Wessels Pautsch, Chicago, IL, for petitioner. Elizabeth Kinney, National Labor Relations Board, Chicago, IL, Bridget O'Connor (argued), National Labor Relations Board Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Aileen Armstrong, National Labor Relations Board Office of the General Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent

  7. Graphic Communications Int. v. N.L.R.B

    977 F.2d 1168 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 14 times   4 Legal Analyses

    No. 91-3901. Argued September 25, 1992. Decided October 21, 1992. Lee W. Jackson, Martin Ganzglass, O'Donnell, Schwartz Anderson, Washington, D.C., Thomas F. Phalen, Jr. (argued), Logothetis Pence, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Robert J. Englehart (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Lawrence T. Zimmerman (argued), Washington, D.C., Charles M. Roesch, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for

  8. Prudential Insurance Company of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    412 F.2d 77 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 34 times
    Recognizing that bargaining obligation "extends to . . . the administration of [CBAs] already adopted"

  9. Opportunity Homes v. N.L.R.B

    101 F.3d 1515 (6th Cir. 1996)   Cited 4 times
    Stating that de novo review applies

  10. International Paper Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    115 F.3d 1045 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 3 times

    No. 95-1606 Argued October 24, 1996 Decided June 27, 1997 Stephen M. Shapiro argued the cause for the petitioner. Timothy S. Bishop and Andrew E. Zelman were on brief. Evan M. Tager entered an appearance. David A. Fleischer, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for the respondent. Linda R. Sher, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, were on brief. Robert D. Kurnick argued the cause for the intervenors and for amicus curiae AFL-CIO