10 Cited authorities
Holly Farms Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
517 U.S. 392 (1996) Cited 136 timesHolding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Magnavox Co. of Tennessee
415 U.S. 322 (1974) Cited 76 timesIn Magnavox, the Board changed its bifurcated rule and adopted the Eighth Circuit's view that the union had no power to waive employee distribution rights on behalf of either itself or another union.
Ark Las Vegas Restaurant Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
334 F.3d 99 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 46 timesUpholding NLRB panel's finding that employer violated the NLRA when supervisor banned employee from talking to her coworkers about joining a union
St. Francis Federation of Nurses & Health Professionals v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
729 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1984) Cited 30 timesStating that "holding a rerun election simply because of the passage of time rewards employer recalcitrance and offers no deterrence to future unfair labor practices"
Holly Farms Corp. v. N.L.R.B
48 F.3d 1360 (4th Cir. 1995) Cited 14 timesHolding that employer had a duty to bargain with union over the effects of a merger on “wages, hours, work rules, work schedules, and work locations”
Marshall Durbin Poultry Co. v. N.L.R.B
39 F.3d 1312 (5th Cir. 1994) Cited 13 timesNo. 93-4057. December 16, 1994. Sidney F. Lewis, Henry T. Arrington, Kullman, Inman, Bee, Downing Banta, New Orleans, LA, for appellant. William Baudler, Aileen Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for appellee. Hugh Frank Malone, Regional Director, N.L.R.B., Region 15, New Orleans, LA, for other Interested Parties. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD
N.L.R.B. v. Honeywell, Inc.
722 F.2d 405 (8th Cir. 1983) Cited 8 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn Honeywell the employer maintained two bulletin boards: one contained notices for company-sponsored organizations and activities, and the other contained employees' notices for work-related activities — except for unions.
W. W. Grainger, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
582 F.2d 1118 (7th Cir. 1978) Cited 11 timesNo. 77-1532. Argued December 7, 1977. Decided August 15, 1978. Charles C. Jackson, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Frederick Havard, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CUMMINGS and SPRECHER, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge. Senior District Judge William J. Campbell of the Northern District of Illinois is sitting by designation. WILLIAM J. CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge. W. W. Grainger, Inc., has petitioned to review
N.L.R.B. v. Daylin, Inc., Discount Division
496 F.2d 484 (6th Cir. 1974) Cited 9 timesIn Daylin, the retail store's no-solicitation rule prohibited all solicitation on its premises during "paid working hours.